Riley Fairholm, shot dead by a Sûreté du Québec police officer – The Tracy Wing Interview / WKT5 #15
“Some systematic, institutionalized fuckery going on.”
In July 2018, 17-year-old Riley Fairholm was shot dead by a Sûreté du Québec police officer on the deserted streets of Lac Brome. This episode is an interview with Riley’s mother, Tracy Wing. We talk about her advocacy, her lawsuit against the Quebec police, and her home town of Knowlton, real life location of the fictitious Three Pines in the Louise Penny novels featuring super Surete du Quebec investigator, Chief Inspector Armand Gamache.
Family of slain teen files lawsuit against SQ and officer
In July 2018, the Sûreté du Québec responded to a 911 call about a man who was walking the streets of Lac-Brome with a weapon. Several officers arrived on the scene and within about a minute, one shot 17-year-old Riley Fairholm in the head.
Katelyn Thomas – Montreal Gazette Publishing date: July 28, 2021
Three years after 17-year-old Riley Fairholm was killed by provincial police in the Eastern Townships, his family has filed a lawsuit against the force and the officer who fired the gun.
“It’s something that we feel like we have to do in order to get some accountability,” Fairholm’s mother, Tracy Wing, told the Montreal Gazette Wednesday. “I feel that the intervention was really short. They didn’t take time to negotiate, and I understand that my son was a threat — I can deal with that — but I don’t understand why they had to kill him.”
The lawsuit, filed with the Quebec Superior Court on July 13, seeks more than $700,000 in damages for Fairholm’s parents and sisters, including $100,000 in punitive damages from the officer who fired the gun. Joël Desruisseaux is named in the lawsuit as the officer in question.
Just after 1 a.m. on July 25, 2018, the Sûreté du Québec responded to a 911 call about a man who was walking the streets of Lac-Brome with a weapon. Several officers arrived on the scene and within about a minute, one shot Fairholm in the head.
“They killed my son in 60 seconds, from the minute they saw him,” Wing said. “And I believe that police officer was negligent, and it caused some damage. We’re damaged by that — all of us.”
The lawsuit states the police intervention took place in the context of a mental health crisis — Fairholm had shown signs of suicidal ideation prior to the event — and he should therefore have been handled as a vulnerable person in need of assistance. It says police should have negotiated with Fairholm and attempted to de-escalate the situation.
Police did the opposite, the lawsuit states, by not adapting their intervention to his mental state or considering that he was outside an empty business in the middle of the night.
“The attempted discussions lasted less than a minute,” the lawsuit says. “Attempts to talk only consisted of repeating the same orders over a loudspeaker.”
It also says the officers erred by not using a less powerful weapon.
“The policeman who fired used excessive and disproportionate force on a 17-year-old boy in distress,” the lawsuit says. “The police would have been able to use less force in order to carry out his arrest, or rather, and above all, to provide him with the necessary assistance.”
It wasn’t until months after Fairholm’s death that his parents learned the officer had shot him in the head. They weren’t allowed to see their son at the hospital where he had been taken after the shooting.
Wing and her ex-husband, Larry Fairholm, filed complaints against the Bureau des enquêtes indépendantes (BEI) and the SQ with the police ethics commissioner, claiming officers broke protocol and tainted the investigation into their son’s death.
In October 2019, following an investigation by the BEI, Quebec’s office of criminal prosecutions (DPCP) said officers involved in the incident had followed the law and that no charges would be laid. Since Fairholm refused to drop his weapon, the DPCP said, he “could have fired at any moment.” The lawsuit states the weapon was a pellet gun.
The Quebec coroner’s office recently announced it would hold a public inquiry into the case.
Three years after Fairholm’s death, his family is still awaiting answers. In addition to feeling grief and despair, they say they have lost confidence in police.
“There’s mistrust everywhere, in all the institutions, because it’s been so difficult to get any information — whether it’s from the prosecutor, the BEI, the SQ or even the coroner,” Wing said. “I’m very grateful that I have a public inquiry from the coroner, but you know, it’s been over three years and it’s appalling to me that it’s taking this long.”
Wing hopes the lawsuit will shed some light on the officer’s thought process.
“He didn’t shoot him in centre mass, so I’m wondering what was he taught at the police academy,” she said.
“If we do have a positive verdict in the lawsuit, that would mean that someone other than I and my family and our friends and many supporters that we have would say that, yes, there was this fault there, and it could have been better — that there’s some responsibility to be had by the SQ, because without their actions, my son would still be alive and we wouldn’t be suffering.”
The Sûreté du Québec declined to comment, “as the case is the subject of legal proceedings.”
Unfucking believable except it isn’t.
Sickening. My heart breaks for the family.
How can a police officer just shoot someone in the head?
Ya. I’m not finished with the SQ. Not even close.
Sickening. How does a police officer just shoot someone in the head?
Hi John
Just listened to the latest episode about Riley Fairholm and just wanted to say how much I enjoyed the conversation with Tracy Wing.
I thought she spoke so sensibly and rationally and I really admire her for everything she’s doing and the way she’s gone about getting justice for her son. I wish her well.
I’m in Liverpool U.K. and really enjoy the show, love your humour and attitude and really love the music.
Cheers
Jay
Awww. That’s so kind, Jay. Thank you!
Hey John
Really enjoyed the show today, thought Tracy Wing was fantastic.
I love the way she has gone about getting justice for her son, sensible but relentless. She doesn’t look that big but I certainly wouldn’t fuck with her.
Also, thanks for not doing CCon UK, you were one of my reasons I was gonna attend so now I don’t have to and save myself shit loads of money.
Keep at them fella
Cheers
That’s one of the easiest interviews I’ve done. I’ve thought about having Tracy on for a while, a finally knew it was time. Sorry about CCUK (I cannot believe they ran with that acronym). Cheers!
Another excellent clusterfuck by Sûreté du Québec and this time it happens in July 2018 and not in 1970s…. After half a century (since 1970s), one would think Sûreté du Québec would have learnt from their past mistakes.
So, help me understand: If you as a 17-year-old hold a pellet gun in your hand which is not aimed at anybody, and stand in the streets in Lac-Brome, the police can kill you in 60 seconds without any negotiation or talk to attempt to end the whole thing without any bloodshed, and that is the law?
The police can execute a teenager and get away with it? They couldn’t talk to the boy so that he’d drop the pellet gun; the police couldn’t use a taser, or shoot the 17-year-old on the arm to disable him? The police just had to shoot him in the head and kill him in 60 seconds?
And three years later they still didn’t have the shooter/police officer in custody or prison? And the parents of the murdered boy still have no access to the coroner’s rapport after three years? And those police officers are getting paid by your tax-money?
That looks like a fascist state to me. If your life and the life of your dear ones mean something to you, run the hell out of that town, that state, that country, because nobody is safe there unless one is working for Sûreté du Québec or some other police force.
Another excellent clusterfuck by Sûreté du Québec and this time it happens in July 2018 and not in 1970s…. After half a century (since 1970s), one would think Sûreté du Québec would have learnt from their past mistakes.
So, help me understand: If you as a 17-year-old hold a pellet gun in your hand which is not aimed at anybody, and stand in the streets in Lac-Brome, the police can kill you in 60 seconds without any negotiation or talk to attempt to end the whole thing without any bloodshed, and that is the law?
The police can execute a teenager and get away with it? They couldn’t talk to the boy so that he’d drop the pellet gun; the police couldn’t use a taser, or shoot the 17-year-old on the arm to disable him? The police just had to shoot him in the head and kill him in 60 seconds?
And three years later they still didn’t have the shooter/police officer in custody or prison? And the parents of the murdered boy still have no access to the coroner’s rapport after three years? And those police officers are getting paid by your tax-money?
That looks like a fascist state to me. If your life and the life of your dear ones mean something to you, run the hell out of that town, that state, that country, because nobody is safe there unless one is working for Sûreté du Québec or some other police force.
Just listened to the Tracy Wing podcast. What a nightmare she has lived these past 3 years. I am feeling so many emotions but my disgust toward the police wins hands down. Corruption in this province has no bounds. Thank you once again John.
Bless you Tracy Wing.
Thanks for listening Marsha.