WES CLARK & MICHAEL MOORE

Ya! That’s the Ticket!

Now I admit the Democratic race is not my oeuvre, but allow me to weigh in on the subject of Wesley Clark (Warning: I will spin this around to an argument about Canada and violence).

It’s bad enough that everytime he smiles Clark looks like a ventriloquist’s dummy… and draping himself in girth of America’s number one Canadian ass-kisser is a sure way not to capture the White House. Yes, I’m talking about Michael Moore – whose idea was it in the Clark camp to latch on to this guy?

I am no lover of guns or the Conservative party, but Michael Moore and his distortions of Canadian society must be addressed; if only to keep Canadians in line. The last thing we need is Canada feeling self-satisfied. Yes, Bowling For Columbine is old news now, but I’ve been chewing on this one for a while and I’d like to have my say.

I have no problem with Moore asserting that Canada has less gun violence than the U.S., but when he conveniently drops the gun part and makes the broader statement that Canada is a less voilent society than the States, I’ve got to take issue:

Clifford Olson, William Fyfe, Robert Pickton. No the names aren’t as well known as their American counterparts, but these three men committed crimes to equal or surpass the likes of Gary Ridgeway and Ted Bundy.

And what’s this business about Toronto being safe? Tell that to the parents of Cecilia Zhang or Holly Jones. Jones was found, in pieces along the shows of Lake Ontario. Anyone want to go boating?

No guns? I’ve felt safer in Watts then I would ever be strolling the Jane / Finch corridor. Toronto subsidized housing is idealic? Come to my home town of Saint John, New Brunswick. I’ll show you some projects. They don’t call it “the Rifle Range” for nothing.

What was I talking about? Oh ya, the Democratic Primaries… well anyway, Wes Clark’s a wooden puppet, and Michael Moore’s still a weenie – my fair and balanced analysis of the situation.

Category:

What was I just saying about parole?

Recent conversation with an American friend:

– So you’re from Canada, right?

– Yes, but I immigrated to the States.

– Do they have the death penalty in Canada?

– No, we believe it’s too barbaric.

– Well what about life imprisonment?

– Oh yes, we have that. Well, sort of.

– How sort of?

– Well in Canada mandatory life sentence is 25 years.

– 25 years?

– That’s for the worst of the worst. But in some cases they could be paroled after serving 2/3rds of their sentence.

– So in Canada life in prison means 16 1/2 years?

– Pretty much. Life = 16.5.

Oh there’s a doozy in this week’s Ottawa Citizen. A board of investigations for the National Parole Board has slapped Corrections Canada on the wrists for failing to adequately assess the risk potential of “psychopath” (their usage), Conrad Brossard.

Brossard was imprisoned for violent offences beginning in 1966. Then he was released. Then he was convicted of murder in 1970. But he was released again. Then he was convicted of attempted murder in 1980, but he escaped. Then he was convicted of attempted murder in 1987 while on… (that’s right) parole!

How many is that? I’ve lost count. Wait, I’m not done yet.

Then Brossard was again granted parole in early 2002.

The 55-year-old was granted permission to work in a nursing home where he proceeded to abduct a senior citizen and stab her to death with a pair of sissors.

Apparently, when Brossard was up for the 2002 parole, there was no chronology of his past offences in his file so the parole board let him go. Corrections Canada was also chastized for the use of freelance psychologists in Quebec (did I mention this all took place in Quebec?); who are high on value but none too bright:

“Using freelance psychologists is a management choice that has the benefit of saving a great deal of money for the Quebec region, although it has the disadvantage of lacking quality control,”

So what’s the upshot of all of this? Nothing. The board of investigation, appointed by both Corrections Canada and the National Parole Board, absolved the parole board of any blame, saying it acted properly on the information laid before it.

What information??? There was nothing in the guys file!!!! Shouldn’t somebody swing for that!!!!

But wait… I haven’t got to the punch line. Are you ready for it? It’s real good… here it comes…

Brossard will be eligable for parole in 2029.

Category:

Two sobering statistics:

– One in six women are assaulted while in college.

– Sixty percent of college-aged males say they would commit sexual assault if they knew they could get away with it.

That’s the bad news. The good news is that thanks to organizations like the non-profit, Security on Campus there is at least a dialogue in the United States about the ongoing problem of violence on college campuses.

Security on Campus posts all kinds of useful resources on the subject of campus violence. There are college crime stats, updates on legislation, even a section on which schools are being sued for failing to comply with the Campus Security Act. There are also sections about club drugs and types of sexual assault such as aquaintance rape. For students and parents who may feel these subjects are taboo, this site is a goldmine of critical information.

Still on the topic of campus violence; though many students who fall victim to sexual assault often become overwhelmed by their ordeal, it is heartening to read that four students at Duke University decided to turn their tragedy into something productive. In yesterday’s Herald Sun newspaper, there is an article about students starting a school magazine on the topic of sexual assault. Saturday Night – Untold Stories of Sexual Assault at Duke was created by victims who want to change the culture in which rape is allowed to happen. Started with seed money from friends and family, the magazine which is distributed throughout the Duke campus includes testimonials from students who were sexually assaulted on campus within the last two years. One of the best entries begins like this:

Dear RAPIST,

How are you doing? How have you been feeling since you took something so personal and private from my friend, against her will, and left her with scars that go far deeper than her face, chest, arm and thigh?

So far the idea is a hit. About 3,000 copies of Saturday Night are produced each month and these are quickly scooped up around campus.

Pointing to the traditional apathetic attitude surrounding violence on campus, co-creator, Allison Brim startes, “There’s a pattern at Duke… People get upset. It lasts for a couple of weeks and then dies down.”

This is not a problem unique to Duke, believe me. Hopefully the buzz created by Saturday Night will start a wave of similar publications on other college campuses.

Category:

Guy Field is Dead

I was in my office talking with a colleague when I got the call that I really wished I hadn’t answered on speakerphone:

– This is the National Parole Board, is this Mr. Allore?

Before I had the chance to tell my colleague that, no, I did not have a relative serving hardtime, he had the grace to discretely leave my office.

– Mr. Allore, we were curious… why do you wish to attend the parole hearings of ten Quebec offenders?

Yeah, so I wrote a letter to the chair of the parole board, Ian Glen. So what? Doesn’t everyone?

I have to confess I have a kink when it comes to Quebec crime. I’m pretty much an expert on the era of 1977 – 1981; that grand time when Quebec cops styled themselves after Kojak, smoking cigarettes and sporting really REALLY big ties. Actually what led to my contacting the parole board was a communique I’d read on Corrections Canada’s notice board:

Décès d’un détenu de l’établissement Archambault

Le 21 octobre 2003 vers 8h40, Guy Field, un détenu de l’établissement Archambault, pénitencier fédéral à sécurité moyenne, est décédé de mort naturelle au Centre régional de soins de l’établissement. Agé de 70 ans, Guy Field purgeait depuis le 2 novembre 1978 une sentence indéterminée pour meurtre au 2e degré.

Guy Field was dead. He died in prison. Now I am practically the last person on the planet who knows who Guy Field was and what he did to be sent away for 25 years.

Guy Field was the “monstre de Levis”. In 1977 he terrorized a tiny suburb on the South shore of Quebec City. Field abducted a child, strangled her and performed unspeakable acts on her dead body. Google Guy Field today and you will find nothing; only this brief blurb – in French – on a corrections newsletter. There is no record of the harm he inflicted, and the lives he destroyed; which in a way I suppose is fitting and just.

But it got me thinking. A mandatory life sentence in Canada – assuming all parole requests where denied – is twenty-five years. In November 2004 – right around the time that Field died of “natural causes” – he might have been eligable for parole. Did Field die naturally, or did someone take matters into their own hands and stop Field.

It’s not an impropable thought. In the last year, five prisoners have died at Archambault penitentiary; all deaths were “morts naturelles”.

But this is a sidetrack to my main concern. Guy Field got me thinking – All those offenders who were put away between 1977 – 1981; what ever happened to them? It’s been twenty-five years; there time’s up. They’ll be getting out now, or in the next few years, if not sooner if they were granted parole.

So this led me to writing the Parole Board. I went trolling for bad guys. I picked ten of the worst offenders from the late seventies – guys that did really unspeakable stuff (crime buffs take note: a good source are the old “Almanachs Du Crime Au Quebec” which were published by Photo Police. Also note: anything by Photo Police is not for the weak stomached).

So I wrote the parole board and asked to see the parole determinations for these ten offenders, and if they were still imprisoned, for the opportunity to attend a future parole hearing. This is my right, and any Canadian’s right, as a citizen of that country.

– Mr. Allore, not to pry, but does this have anything to do with your sister, are you thinking that these men might have in someway been responsible?

I couldn’t believe the parole officer would have the nerve to ask this – under the rules of Access to Information, they have no right to ask such a question. I took it in stride:

– Madam, as you can see, most of these offenders were imprisoned BEFORE my sister died. So it would be unlikely that they were responsible for her death.

Alright…. Well, we’re going to grant your request. It just seems odd. people don’t usually ask to attend ten parole hearings.

I have no intention of attending ten parole hearings, but I didn’t tell her that; this was my way of finding out if these guys were still incarcerated. If they were, then NPB would have to notify me of their next parole hearing (pretty clever, I know; but it wasn’t my idea – I got it from a victims advocate in Toronto).

Then again maybe I will attend all ten hearings. Shouldn’t someone stand up and tell people about what has been forgotten? Shouldn’t someone speak for those victims who have been silenced and cannot speak for themselves?

Category:

Guy Field is Dead

I was in my office talking with a colleague when I got the call that I really wished I hadn’t answered on speakerphone:

– This is the National Parole Board, is this Mr. Allore?

Before I had the chance to tell my colleague that, no, I did not have a relative serving hardtime, he had the grace to discretely leave my office.

– Mr. Allore, we were curious… why do you wish to attend the parole hearings of ten Quebec offenders?

Yeah, so I wrote a letter to the chair of the parole board, Ian Glen. So what? Doesn’t everyone?

I have to confess I have a kink when it comes to Quebec crime. I’m pretty much an expert on the era of 1977 – 1981; that grand time when Quebec cops styled themselves after Kojak, smoking cigarettes and sporting really REALLY big ties. Actually what led to my contacting the parole board was a communique I’d read on Corrections Canada’s notice board:

Décès d’un détenu de l’établissement Archambault

Le 21 octobre 2003 vers 8h40, Guy Field, un détenu de l’établissement Archambault, pénitencier fédéral à sécurité moyenne, est décédé de mort naturelle au Centre régional de soins de l’établissement. Agé de 70 ans, Guy Field purgeait depuis le 2 novembre 1978 une sentence indéterminée pour meurtre au 2e degré. 

Guy Field was dead. He died in prison. Now I am practically the last person on the planet who knows who Guy Field was and what he did to be sent away for 25 years.

Guy Field was the “monstre de Levis”. In 1977 he terrorized a tiny suburb on the South shore of Quebec City. Field abducted a child, strangled her and performed unspeakable acts on her dead body. Google Guy Field today and you will find nothing; only this brief blurb – in French – on a corrections newsletter. There is no record of the harm he inflicted, and the lives he destroyed; which in a way I suppose is fitting and just.

But it got me thinking. A mandatory life sentence in Canada – assuming all parole requests where denied – is twenty-five years. In November 2004 – right around the time that Field died of “natural causes” – he might have been eligable for parole. Did Field die naturally, or did someone take matters into their own hands and stop Field. 

It’s not an impropable thought. In the last year, five prisoners have died at Archambault penitentiary; all deaths were “morts naturelles”.

But this is a sidetrack to my main concern. Guy Field got me thinking – All those offenders who were put away between 1977 – 1981; what ever happened to them? It’s been twenty-five years; there time’s up. They’ll be getting out now, or in the next few years, if not sooner if they were granted parole. 

So this led me to writing the Parole Board. I went trolling for bad guys. I picked ten of the worst offenders from the late seventies – guys that did really unspeakable stuff (crime buffs take note: a good source are the old “Almanachs Du Crime Au Quebec” which were published by Photo Police. Also note: anything by Photo Police is not for the weak stomached). 

So I wrote the parole board and asked to see the parole determinations for these ten offenders, and if they were still imprisoned, for the opportunity to attend a future parole hearing. This is my right, and any Canadian’s right, as a citizen of that country.

– Mr. Allore, not to pry, but does this have anything to do with your sister, are you thinking that these men might have in someway been responsible?

I couldn’t believe the parole officer would have the nerve to ask this – under the rules of Access to Information, they have no right to ask such a question. I took it in stride:

– Madam, as you can see, most of these offenders were imprisoned BEFORE my sister died. So it would be unlikely that they were responsible for her death.

Alright…. Well, we’re going to grant your request. It just seems odd. people don’t usually ask to attend ten parole hearings.

I have no intention of attending ten parole hearings, but I didn’t tell her that; this was my way of finding out if these guys were still incarcerated. If they were, then NPB would have to notify me of their next parole hearing (pretty clever, I know; but it wasn’t my idea – I got it from a victims advocate in Toronto).

Then again maybe I will attend all ten hearings. Shouldn’t someone stand up and tell people about what has been forgotten? Shouldn’t someone speak for those victims who have been silenced and cannot speak for themselves?

Category:

Part V – They Decided To Publish The Letter

Response to last week’s letter from current Bishop’s student:

Last week Bishop’s student, Rebecca Blinn complained about me in The Record for spamming her with email. She was right to do so. Though I regret my decision to send out these emails and have since apologized to Ms. Blinn and other School alumni who I may have offended, I still must take issue with Ms. Blinn’s decision to use her letter as a pretext to say my complaints against Champlain College are unjustified.

Because my sister’s case is currently under investigation by the Montreal Sûreté du Quebec, there are limits to what I can say, but in order to demonstrate to Ms. Blinn – and others – that I am not chasing windmills, allow me to show the connection between a 25-year-old murder and the present Champlain Administration.

Champlain maintains that it had – and has – done everything to cooperate with the authorities in connection with the death of my sister, Theresa. However, in 1978, Champlain Administration failed to disclose to my parents, the local police, a private

investigator, and the Sûreté du Quebec the identity of the Director of Residence – therefore the person in charge – at the King’s Hall Residence. Instead they mislead authorities – and my family – and pretended that a twenty-five-year old female grad student was in charge of the facility. The true Director of Residence was never interviewed, referred to, or interrogated in the course of the original investigation. His name does not appear in any of the files of Leo Hamel, the original Lennoxville investigator; Robert Beaulac, the ’78 private detective; or in Roch Gaudreault’s case file for the Sûreté du Quebec. It was as though the Director of Residence for Champlain College never existed.

When a young student disappears from a college residence, and is later found dead less than a mile from that residence, I would think one of the first people the authorities would want to interview is the Director of Residence.

It is well-documented in the school archives that the Director of Residence at that time was supervised by the then Director of Student Services. The Director of Student Services in 1978 is now the current Director General for Champlain College. Indeed, by my last count, close to one-third of the staff and administration from 1978 are still working at Champlain. So I find it hard to swallow that Champlain College – and members of the community for that matter – don’t know what I’m driving at, and fail to see my point.

In her letter Ms. Blinn asserted that to her satisfaction, newspapers had reported on the matter of my sister’s death and found no real incriminating evidence against Champlain College. When last I checked, newspapers are not in charge of criminal investigations. The crime of murder is precisely what the Montreal Sûreté du Quebec are currently investigating. When that process is through – only then – may a spectator to this affair “possibly” assert with any degree of confidence that Champlain College did nothing wrong.

There are other matters. Ms. Blinn states that she trusts the local police force and School staff. I wish that I had the same degree of confidence. But we are not talking about “sticky situations”. This is about violence and sexual assault against women; issues not to be trivialized. Champlain / Bishop’s present system of employing a parking enforcement unit under the guise of campus security is vulnerable to danger and woefully ill-equipped to handle issues of campus violence (sidenote: the Schools also have a Women’s Centre held together by bandaids, student volunteers, and $800 in SAC funding).

I can recall one other situation similar to that of my sister Theresa. In 1986 a young women named Jeanne Clery was murdered on the campus of Lehigh University in Pennsylvania. After a lot of blaming back and forth between the parents and the school, Lehigh made amends, and became one of the founders and leaders on issues of campus security in the United States.

Lehigh showed a lot of class.

Let there be no question of my motives: I wish the School to reform, to make a true effort to act in the interest of student safety. If the community is so confident of Champlain’s improvement, and if Champlain feels it is doing a better job representing the safety concerns of students, then I ask this: reveal to us, Champlain/Bishop’s the results of your last safety audit and show us the steps you have undertaken to improve campus living in the interest of student safety.

John Allore

Chapel Hill, NC

Category:

Part IV

I Can’t Seem To Get To You Through The U.S. Mail

The Sherbrooke Record newspaper won’t publish my letter to the editor. They say I’m fuming because I got busted for sending spam, and now I’m using it as an excuse to get back on my soapbox. Also, I accused a current School administrator of obstucting justice and called for his resignation.

– well, ya.. –

I counted to the Record that they were trying to silence me. They are the only newspaper in the region that hasn’t acknowledged that the police have reactivated my sister’s case.

The Record stated that this wasn’t true. That there have been over 18 stories in their paper about the case, and they have given ample attention to the matter – everyone in the region is aware of the Theresa Allore tragedy. Moreover, everytime they talk to the Surete du Quebec, the Srete says that in fact there isn’t an active investigation.

Well the part about the SQ is true, and it’s an ongoing problem. The Surete never confirms anything for the press. Everytime a journalist contacts the Surete, they give them their standard pitter-patter:

the case is still open because as an unsolved crime it can never be closed… if we receive new leads of course we always pursue them, but currently we have received no new information…

This, despite the fact that for the past year I have had weekly contact with a Surete investigator who is working on my sister’s case. Nevertheless, as far as the Record is concerned, I’ve been talking to a big white rabbit.

By now I have gone through about a dozen revisions for a letter I don’t even care about anymore. I’ve spent more time on this letter than some people dedicate to their doctoral thesis. I am so sick of this fucking letter.

Finally I say screw it – the Record never intended to publish anything I wrote, they were just stirnging me along to embarrass me. Then they throw me a bone. If I will agree to remove all the stuff about naming current employees, they’ll take one more look at the letter.

Ok, whatever…

What a rediculous thing for me to be wasting my time on.

Finally, the editor of the Record called me back and agreed to publish my letter in tomorrow’s paper. I’ve wasted an entire week on this thing.

Category:

Part III – La Guerre Perpétuelle

I’ve changed my mind. I’ve decided to respond to the woman who complained about me in the local paper.

What bothers me most is the following remark she made:

“I see no connection between a 1978 murder and the law-abiding institutions [these schools] are today. “

I’ve decided to show her exactly what the connection is.

So I draft a letter for publication in the Sherbrooke Record. The first version is libelous. I’m calling people liars left-right-and-centre. So I take out all the stuff about lying and send a second version. But who am I kidding? Even without the rehetoric they won’t publish this: I’m basically telling them to close down Bishop’s University and Champlain college: the entire English speaking population of the Eastern Townships would be out of a job.

Regrouping I decide to make my case over the phone. I call the editor of the Sherbrooke Record:

Did you get my letter?

Which one John?

(by now I’ve sent about a half-dozen)

That was the last one, I promise.

John, haven’t we covered this ground before ?

This is different. No one’s ever answered the question, “what is the connection between the School and your sister’s murder?” This student asked the question…

Bla, bla, bla…

I drone on and on. It suddenly strikes me…

why am I doing this? Is this really worth reaching out to 5,000 readers who don’t like you? I’m the guy who farted at their crowded cocktail party, they don’t want to hear this.

John, I tell you what, let me look at it overnight and I’ll give you an answer in the morning.



Alright.

It’s not just the letter that bothers me. Partly I’ve been bolstered by support. A student emailed me the following. It is troubling because this comes from a recent graduate who had no knowledge of problems on campus:

I was shocked when I read about your sister’s tragic death. Though I always knew Bishop’s Campus fauna of rumours and urban myths to be very rich, I never heard any serious stories during my stay at Champlain (from summer 2001 to summer 2003).

Up until I discovered your website through that post on my blog, I thought the story concerning a ghost in McKinnon Hall was pretty much as sinister as Lennoxville’s history would ever get.

It am outraged the student body isn’t more aware of this incident, so much so, in fact, that I am at a loss for words.

Me too.

Category:

PETITE GUERRE – PART II

Emboldened by insomnia, I decided to c.c. my job application letter submitted to Champlain College to my brother, the editor of the local paper, the campus priest, the school football coach, and 40 college alumni.

It was the the sort of idea that appeared brilliant at four in the morning.

Later it occured to me that strangers mights not appreciate my sense of humor. I quickly scribbled off another letter:

I am sending this email because I thought you should know that before you attended Champlain College my sister, Theresa Allore was a student at Champlain and she was murdered there. This happened 25 years ago, so I am not asking for your sympathy. But over the years, Champlain Administration and their Board of Governors have fought hard to keep this story suppressed in order to protect the College’s reputation. It has long been my suspicion that over the years, other young women have fallen victim to sexual assaults on campus, but the College has managed to hush these incidents.

If you would like more information on the details of the case and Champlain’s involvement in the affair, please visit the website: www.whokilledtheresa.com

Also, if you experienced a sexual assault on campus or know anyone who had a similar experience in their time at Champlain, or if you have information that you feel may be relevant, I would ask that you contact

me at this email or through the website.

Finally, if you are in touch with other Champlain or Bishop’s alumni I ask that you please pass this email on to them.

I thank you for your time, I’m sorry if I brought down your day, and I wish you a happy new year.

John Allore

Still the damage had been done. And the response was swift and stinging:

My brother was the first to email me:

Can you drop by so I can take your temperature?

Then an alumni:

– M. Allore,

I do sympathise with your cause but could you please remove my e-mail address from your sending list.

I hope you will understand.

Still another alumni:

– What is this thing!

Please delete me from your sending list!

thank you very much!

The worst comes from a local college student.

She decides to write a letter to the editor of the local paper, but then she proceeds to copy my email at the end of her complaint. The Sherbrooke Record publishes the letter. The woman unwittingly distributes my plea to approx. 5,000 readers:

Insulted by insinuations against college

Dear Editor,

Recently I was sifting through my junk email when there was a title: Attention Champlain College Alumni. Assuming it was something for me I opened it up, and much to my surprise it was a warning about Champlain College and its 1978 involvement in the death of Theresa Allore.

The Record, The National Post and other newspapers have done articles on this case and I found no real incriminating evidence against Champlain College. I myself am insulted that Mr. Allore believes he can harass ex-Champlain students in hopes of coming to peace with the tragic and unsolved death of his sister. I am a little worried about his motives for spamming this message, and I hope that he has not caused any

problems for the school. I am saddened that this young woman was murdered and that the case is unsolved but I am confused as to why he is trying to scare off students from attending Champlain and Bishop’s. I

trust in the police force and the staff at both institutions, to uphold the law in sticky situations.

As an ex-Champlain student and a present

Bishop’s student, I see no connection between a 1978 murder and the law-abiding institutions they are today.

Rebecca Blinn

Bishop’s University Student

Attached is the email I received from John Allore

I considered writing a letter back to the paper to defend myself, but then decided to let things lie.

She had her point. And I was being an intollerable pain-in-the-ass.

Category:

PETITE GUERRE

Recent posting on Champlain College website:

JOB OPENINGS ON CAMPUS: CAMPUS DIRECTOR

Champlain Regional College is seeking the services of a DIRECTOR for CHAMPLAIN-LENNOXVILLE to work on a full-time permanent basis.

FUNCTIONS

The Director’s duties will include the following:

• Participate with other College Officers in the development, formulation and revision of College-wide objectives, plans, policies and procedures and establish appropriate mechanisms to ensure their realization and implementation at Champlain – Lennoxville.

• [bla, bla, bla, bla bla ]

• Represent and promote Champlain – Lennoxville in the local community and ensure that it is a partner in the socio-economic development of the community.

• Be a member of the Director General’s Advisory Committee, attend meetings of the Executive Committee and report on activities at Champlain – Lennoxville at each meeting of the Board of Governors.

• Other tasks assigned by the Director General.

QUALIFICATIONS

Education Graduate degree or equivalent years of schooling in an appropriate area of specialization.

Experience Eight (8) years relevant experience of which at least three (3) have been in a senior management position. Teaching experience at the post-secondary level will be considered an asset.

Other Effective communication skills in English and in French are required.

Candidates may be submitted to selection tests.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Monday , January 19, 2004

DATE OF POSTING: Friday, December 12, 2003

CLOSING DATE FOR

APPLICATIONS: Monday, January 5, 2004

MY RESPONSE:

Selection Committee for the Director – Champlain – Lennoxville

Attn: D Brisson

CHAMPLAIN REGIONAL COLLEGE

P.O. Box 5000

Sherbrooke ( Quebec ) J1H 5N1

January 5, 2004

Re: Application for position of Director / Champlain-Lennoxville

Dear Selection Commmittee:

Attached please find my resume that I wish to submit for the position of Director for Champlain Regional College – Lennoxville. Although my experience is primarily in Finance, I feel I possess critical skills and key experience that will prove to you I am more than qualified as a candidate for this position.

I have a twenty-five year history with Champlain College and the surrounding community of Lennoxville. As well, I maintain many strong relationships with the neighboring town of Sherbrooke, and have worked hard in the last two years at becoming bilingual. In addition I am on a first name basis with many of the current administration including my soon-to-be supervisor, Gerald Cuttting, Len Davis, and outgoing Director, Bertrand Daigneault. In fact, I believe I once met one of your first Campus Directors, Bill Matson, who once referred to my sister as a runaway-lesbian-druggy – which was his loving way of saying she wasn’t worth looking for. Of course there is that recent matter of Bernie Daigneault accusing me of making “gratuitous, unfounded and untruthful attacks on (the School’s) sterling reputation “, but I’m sure we can all put that behind us.

I have reviewed the Functions you have outlined for the incoming director; after reading my resume I’m sure you will agree I am ably qualified to carry out these duties. In addition, I know how much you value subterfuge; especially sweeping problems under the rug when they involve the affairs of pesky students. Although at present I do not possess these abilities, I will work hard under your tutelage to develop this special skill set.

Undoubtedly you will have a lot of questions, and most of those can be covered in the interview. Before we get to that, there is one request that I have for you.

If you would publicly apologize for your behavior with regard to the events surrounding the disappearance and murder of my sister, Theresa Allore, and admit that your comments and actions over the past 25 years – particularly your unfounded attempts to gratuitously

and untruthfully discredit her reputation – were base, hurtful and unwarranted; then I’m sure we can eliminate the interview and get right down to the drug screen and offer letter.

I thank you for your time and consideration and I look forward to hearing from you

soon.

Sincerely,

John Allore

www.whokilledtheresa.blogspot.com

Category: